<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Death of Search Engines?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techconsumer.com/2008/06/10/the-death-of-search-engines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techconsumer.com/2008/06/10/the-death-of-search-engines/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:29:32 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Abdul Koroma</title>
		<link>http://www.techconsumer.com/2008/06/10/the-death-of-search-engines/comment-page-1/#comment-3948</link>
		<dc:creator>Abdul Koroma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/?p=912#comment-3948</guid>
		<description>The problem with SEs are becoming more and more obvious to end users. As people opt for a richer online experience, it seems traditional SEs are just failing to make that a reality.It was the same issue discuss on this provocative blog: Google devolution effect(http://www.internetevolution.com/author.asp?section_id=644&amp;doc_id=154069&amp;F_src=flftwo). I don&#039;t see them extincting in the long run but their relevance will be seriously diminish and as you correctly pointed out, are the alternatives good enough to fill the void??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with SEs are becoming more and more obvious to end users. As people opt for a richer online experience, it seems traditional SEs are just failing to make that a reality.It was the same issue discuss on this provocative blog: Google devolution effect(http://www.internetevolution.com/author.asp?section_id=644&amp;doc_id=154069&amp;F_src=flftwo). I don&#8217;t see them extincting in the long run but their relevance will be seriously diminish and as you correctly pointed out, are the alternatives good enough to fill the void??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Ellis</title>
		<link>http://www.techconsumer.com/2008/06/10/the-death-of-search-engines/comment-page-1/#comment-3944</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Ellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 01:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/?p=912#comment-3944</guid>
		<description>I think what is happening is that people are just going online more for everything. As a percentage of usage, Google may be lower thanks to Wikipedia, Amazon, etc, but as for absolute usage it is probably higher.

That still speaks to a Google losing relevance though. When I want X, Y, or Z I&#039;m not going there (although I&#039;m going to Live Search instead of Google anyway :).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what is happening is that people are just going online more for everything. As a percentage of usage, Google may be lower thanks to Wikipedia, Amazon, etc, but as for absolute usage it is probably higher.</p>
<p>That still speaks to a Google losing relevance though. When I want X, Y, or Z I&#8217;m not going there (although I&#8217;m going to Live Search instead of Google anyway <img src='http://www.techconsumer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Caswell</title>
		<link>http://www.techconsumer.com/2008/06/10/the-death-of-search-engines/comment-page-1/#comment-3943</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Caswell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 00:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/?p=912#comment-3943</guid>
		<description>Search still is handy for fairly specific information still not available via this new crop of &quot;social&quot; sites. But it is true that, at this point, I use Google more as the new yellow pages or movie listing service than as traditional online search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Search still is handy for fairly specific information still not available via this new crop of &#8220;social&#8221; sites. But it is true that, at this point, I use Google more as the new yellow pages or movie listing service than as traditional online search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
