<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blu-ray Movies Now Affordable. Players? Not So Much.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techconsumer.com/2008/05/29/blu-ray-movies-now-affordable-players-not-so-much/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techconsumer.com/2008/05/29/blu-ray-movies-now-affordable-players-not-so-much/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:29:32 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Caswell</title>
		<link>http://www.techconsumer.com/2008/05/29/blu-ray-movies-now-affordable-players-not-so-much/comment-page-1/#comment-3881</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Caswell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 15:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/?p=894#comment-3881</guid>
		<description>At this point, it seems the Sony PS3 is still one of the best values for blu-ray. The blu-ray player software is upgradeable so early adopters don&#039;t get burned. Plus you get a great console system with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At this point, it seems the Sony PS3 is still one of the best values for blu-ray. The blu-ray player software is upgradeable so early adopters don&#8217;t get burned. Plus you get a great console system with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
