<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When Online Mobs Get Organized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techconsumer.com/2008/04/04/when-online-mobs-get-organized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techconsumer.com/2008/04/04/when-online-mobs-get-organized/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2011 10:20:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arancaytar</title>
		<link>http://www.techconsumer.com/2008/04/04/when-online-mobs-get-organized/comment-page-1/#comment-3660</link>
		<dc:creator>Arancaytar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 15:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/2008/04/04/when-online-mobs-get-organized/#comment-3660</guid>
		<description>&gt; order sprung from chaos.

Perhaps &quot;inanity&quot; is more apt than &quot;order&quot; in this case. But I looked at the comments section and it was indeed quite impressive how rigorously the &quot;structure&quot; (inane as it was) was enforced.

--

(And here I thought the headline would be about Anonymous and Scientology...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; order sprung from chaos.</p>
<p>Perhaps &#8220;inanity&#8221; is more apt than &#8220;order&#8221; in this case. But I looked at the comments section and it was indeed quite impressive how rigorously the &#8220;structure&#8221; (inane as it was) was enforced.</p>
<p>&#8211;</p>
<p>(And here I thought the headline would be about Anonymous and Scientology&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

