Comments on: HD DVD Still Winning Price War vs. Blu-ray: Player & 10 Movies $219

By: Breaking: Blu-ray Gets Warner Bros. Movies Exclusively, HD DVD Left Relying on Low Price | TechConsumer

Fri, 04 Jan 2008 22:31:15 +0000

[...] a price significantly lower than Blu-ray. As a quick recap, the lowest price I’ve found for a Blu-ray player is $279 compared to HD DVD’s $174 (that deal that was good enough to make me choose a [...]

By: SMP

SMP — Sun, 16 Dec 2007 14:30:15 +0000

In short, comparing HD DVD to Blu-ray via Amazon’s current best deals for each has HD DVD players coming in $40-$60 cheaper. And they come with twice the movies plus have other movies available for as little as $10. Which would you buy?
…
…
Well Bluray obviously, because it is outselling HD-DVD by about 3 to 1.
.
Actually the HD player prices are distorted now because of subsidies by Toshiba and Sony in order to push their own format and try to get it established as a standard. Toshiba subsidises it’s HD-DVD players and Sony subsidises the PS3. Other manufacturers are pricing high and selling to AV enthusiasts only. The manufacturing costs are similar for both HD-DVD and Bluray are about the same, and the $99 HD-DVD players reported were prices to clear the shelves of unsold old HD-DVD players to make way for newer models.

By: Logan Bobo

Logan Bobo — Fri, 14 Dec 2007 01:47:15 +0000

Yeah, let’s do stop. When the sarcasm starts coming out I know this will only end badly.

By: Bob Caswell

Bob Caswell — Thu, 13 Dec 2007 19:17:26 +0000

“I’m talking mostly about the greater capacity, which always seems to become an issue during the lifespan of a storage format.”

Um, that is, if we’re talking computers. But last time I checked, capacity was never an issue for the regular old DVD. And if you look at the allocation of space for next gen movies, it’s really not going to be a problem with either format… again.

And my argument was based on market share? Maybe, sort of, but I listed a couple different features which have nothing to do with market share.

But you’re probably right about this topic not necessarily deserving such detailed conversation. I just can’t help myself when it comes up!

By: Logan Bobo

Logan Bobo — Thu, 13 Dec 2007 18:53:19 +0000

Well, it’s true I’m talking mostly about the greater capacity, which always seems to become an issue during the lifespan of a storage format. And the greater high-end capacity qualifies it as a slightly better technology, I think (your argument against it is not on technology grounds but market-share grounds!).

But I don’t think the differences are anything that deserves a whole lot of discussion–certainly not enough to take up the several comments it already has with the addition of this one.

By: Bob Caswell

Bob Caswell — Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:58:08 +0000

And I should mention that HD DVD also allows for combo discs where the movie can work on HD DVD or DVD players (many of the HD DVD movies come in this dual format). Blu-ray movies don’t have that option; they will only work on Blu-ray players.

By: Bob Caswell

Bob Caswell — Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:46:57 +0000

Interesting, Logan. I certainly can understand your hesitance, but I wonder if you could provide more specifics on your intel that puts Blu-ray as slightly better technology.

Here’s what I know: Both formats use pretty much the same codec, which is the number one determinant of picture quality. Blu-ray players usually come standard as 1080p whereas HD-DVD has the cheaper and “less quality” option of 1080i. But that could be argued as positive for HD-DVD, giving consumers more control (after all, there are plenty of HDTV buyers whose TVs don’t support 1080p, so why pay for it if you won’t use it?).

Another area where Blu-ray is arguably “better” is that its discs can hold 50gigs whereas HD-DVD discs can hold only 30gigs. But the way movies work, those maxes aren’t even close to being hit.

And one area where HD DVD actually is “better” technology than Blu-ray:

All HD DVD players are required to come with network connectivity, which allows for more advanced features (which I mentioned in an earlier article) and easier updates. Blu-ray players, on the other hand, may or may not come with network connectivity. And so far, they’ve needed more updates, which would be a huge pain if not automatic through online connectivity.

Also, remember that HD DVDs work anywhere in the world whereas Blu-ray are region specific.

Anyway, let me know if you know something I’m missing… But I think it’s hard to say one is better (even slightly) at this point. But if I were to pick which is “better” technology, you probably could guess my opinion based on the above info…

By: Logan Bobo

Logan Bobo — Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:10:04 +0000

This is actually a pretty good step still for Blu-Ray. So far B-R players have cost a lot more than HD DVD, so making one available in the same general price range is a huge step. Especially since the word is that Blu-Ray is slightly better technology (though in truth the two formats are remarkably similar).

But I don’t know. I just can’t pull the trigger yet on either. Blasted format wars! The most annoying thing of all is that combo players cost more than buying two separate units. Luckily I haven’t felt the need yet–few of the movies I watch are in either format (a quick look at my Netflix queue shows just 2 movies in my first 20).

By: HD DVD’s New Feature: Watching Movies Together But Not In the Same Place | TechConsumer

Thu, 13 Dec 2007 03:26:48 +0000

[...] 2* Check out our latest coverage of comparing HD DVD and Blu-ray via the best deals available on Amazon. Subscribe to TechConsumer: RSS / Email Sphere It 19 Comments Posted on: [...]