<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New iPods Released: All But Shuffle Now Include Video</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techconsumer.com/2007/09/05/new-ipods-released-all-but-shuffle-now-include-video/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techconsumer.com/2007/09/05/new-ipods-released-all-but-shuffle-now-include-video/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2011 10:20:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.techconsumer.com/2007/09/05/new-ipods-released-all-but-shuffle-now-include-video/comment-page-1/#comment-1035</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 17:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/2007/09/05/new-ipods-released-all-but-shuffle-now-include-video/#comment-1035</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m very happy with my new 80GB iPod &quot;Classic.&quot; I personally think it now represents the &quot;sweet spot&quot; in the lineup, now that the price dropped $100 to $249. 

Still love my 4GB 1st generation Nano, but the 80 GB capacity of my new toy will let me take tons of music (and movies) with me. The 160GB model was tempting, but the much thinner form factor of the 80GB made it the clear winner.

The iPod Touch is fantastic, but I just can&#039;t see paying that much for only 8/16 GB capacity. As RAM prices continue to drop, I look forward to seeing an 80GB Touch within a year or two. That will be an unbeatable combination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m very happy with my new 80GB iPod &#8220;Classic.&#8221; I personally think it now represents the &#8220;sweet spot&#8221; in the lineup, now that the price dropped $100 to $249. </p>
<p>Still love my 4GB 1st generation Nano, but the 80 GB capacity of my new toy will let me take tons of music (and movies) with me. The 160GB model was tempting, but the much thinner form factor of the 80GB made it the clear winner.</p>
<p>The iPod Touch is fantastic, but I just can&#8217;t see paying that much for only 8/16 GB capacity. As RAM prices continue to drop, I look forward to seeing an 80GB Touch within a year or two. That will be an unbeatable combination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Caswell</title>
		<link>http://www.techconsumer.com/2007/09/05/new-ipods-released-all-but-shuffle-now-include-video/comment-page-1/#comment-1015</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Caswell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 23:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techconsumer.com/2007/09/05/new-ipods-released-all-but-shuffle-now-include-video/#comment-1015</guid>
		<description>Good overview... The one thing you missed that I think is worth mentioning is the fact that you&#039;ll be able to use iTunes now on the iPod Touch and the iPhone.

I think that could become very popular... Browsing songs, listening to samples, and then buying songs directly from your mp3 player. And it&#039;ll sync with your computer later. Nice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good overview&#8230; The one thing you missed that I think is worth mentioning is the fact that you&#8217;ll be able to use iTunes now on the iPod Touch and the iPhone.</p>
<p>I think that could become very popular&#8230; Browsing songs, listening to samples, and then buying songs directly from your mp3 player. And it&#8217;ll sync with your computer later. Nice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

